Symptoms & Signs
- Chest pain
- Sudden onset
- Severe, sharp and tearing
- May be localized to the front or back of the chest
- Often the interscapular region
- Typically migrates with propagation of the dissection
- Diaphoresis
- Syncope
- Dyspnea
- Weakness
- Physical findings (frequencies from registry data[1])
- Reflect complications resulting from the dissection occluding the major arteries
- Hypertension (more common in type B) or hypotension (more common in type A)
- Loss of pulses
- ~30 % of type A
- ~20% of type B
- Acute aortic regurgitation
- ~44% of type A, 12% of type B
- Bounding pulses
- Wide pulse pressure
- Diastolic murmur, often radiating along the right sternal border
- Congestive heart failure
- Pulmonary edema (rales)
- Neurologic findings due to carotid artery obstruction or spinal cord ischemia
- Hemiplegia
- Hemianesthesia
- Paraplegia
- Bowel ischemia
- Renal ischemia with hematuria
- Myocardial ischemia
- Reflect complications resulting from compression of adjacent structures (superior cervical ganglion, superior vena cava, bronchus, esophagus) by the expanding dissection causing aneurysmal aortic dilatation
- Horners syndrome
- Superior vena cava syndrome
- Hoarseness
- Dysphagia
- Airway compromise
- Cardiac tamponade
- 10% of patients present without typical chest pain and pulse deficits.[1]

Differential Diagnosis
- Other causes of chest pain
- Myocardial infarction (MI)
- An electrocardiogram (EEG) that shows no evidence of myocardial ischemia is helpful in distinguishing aortic dissection from MI.
- Rarely, dissection involves the right or left coronary ostium and causes acute MI.
- Unstable angina
- Aortic aneurysm without dissection
- Pulmonary disorders
- Pericardial disease
- GI disorders

Diagnostic Approach
- A high index of suspicion is important in:
- Patients with evolving signs and symptoms
- Patients with simultaneous multiple neurologic and vascular complaints
- Up to 30% of patients with dissection are initially suspected to have other conditions.[2]
- Transesophageal echocardiography, CT, and MRI are the diagnostic procedures of choice over contrast aortography.
- Their relative utility depends on availability and expertise in individual institutions as well as on the hemodynamic stability of the patient.
- CT and MRI are less suitable for unstable patients; echocardiography should be the initial test in these patients.
- CT has advantage of being able to exclude other diagnoses (e.g., pulmonary embolism) simultaneously.
- Transesophageal echocardiography is a more sensitive test than transthoracic echocardiography, but the latter is better tolerated by unstable patients.
- Chest x-ray is not a reliable test to rule in or rule out aortic dissection, but will be abnormal in a majority of patients.

Laboratory Tests
- No laboratory tests are helpful in diagnosing aortic dissection.
- D-dimer
- A negative d-dimer test has been proposed as a useful test for ruling out dissection.
- However, data currently do not support the use of d-dimer as the sole modality in diagnosis.[3]
- Laboratory abnormalities depend on the vascular sequelae of the dissection.

Imaging
- Chest radiography
- Abnormal in 6090%
- May be normal, particularly in type A dissections[2]
- Widened mediastinum
- Pleural effusion (usually left-sided) may be present.
- Dissections of the descending thoracic aorta: Descending aorta may appear to be wider than the ascending portion.
- Dissection can be confirmed by CT, MRI, or ultrasonography (especially transesophageal echocardiography).
- CT and MRI
- Highly accurate in identifying the intimal flap and the extent of the dissection
- Each has a sensitivity and specificity > 90%.
- Useful in recognizing intramural hemorrhage and penetrating ulcers
- CT reconstructions can be used to guide surgery.
- MRI can detect blood flow.
- May be useful in characterizing antegrade vs retrograde dissection
- Echocardiography
- Transthoracic echocardiography
- Imaging technique of choice in unstable patients
- Overall sensitivity of 6085%
- Sensitivity > 80% in diagnosing proximal ascending aortic dissections
- Less useful for detecting dissection of the arch and descending thoracic aorta
- Transesophageal echocardiography
- Requires greater skill and patient cooperation
- Very accurate in identifying dissections of the ascending and descending thoracic aorta, but not the arch
- 98% sensitivity and ~90% specificity
- Echocardiography provides important information on the presence and severity of:
- Aortic regurgitation
- Pericardial effusion
- Aortography
- Recommended if results of noninvasive imaging techniques are not definitive
- May be used to:
- Document diagnosis
- Identify entry point, intimal flap, and the false and true lumina
- Establish extent of dissection into the major arteries
- Sensitivity
- 70% for an intimal flap
- 56% for the site of intimal tear
- 87% for false lumen
- Cannot recognize intramural hemorrhage
- Coronary angiography
- May be performed concomitantly with aortography in high-risk patients in evaluation and preparation for surgery

Diagnostic Procedures
- EGC
- If no evidence of myocardial ischemia, helpful in distinguishing aortic dissection from myocardial ischemia
- However, ECG changes can mimic those of acute coronary syndrome.

Classification
- Anatomic classification
- DeBakey classification
- Type I: Dissection involves both ascending and descending aorta.
- Intimal tear occurs in the ascending aorta but involves the descending aorta as well.
- Type II: Dissection is limited to the ascending aorta.
- Type III: Dissection is limited to the descending aorta.
- Stanford classification
- Type A: Dissection involves the ascending aorta (proximal dissection).
- Independent of site of tear and distal extension
- Type B: Dissection is limited to the descending aorta (distal dissection).
- From a management standpoint, classification into type A or B is more practical and useful because DeBakey types I and II are managed in a similar manner.
- Mechanistic classification
- Svensson classification
- Class 1: classic dissection with true and false lumen
- Class 2: intramural hematoma or hemorrhage
- Class 3: subtle dissection without hematoma
- Class 4: atherosclerotic penetrating ulcer
- Class 5: iatrogenic or traumatic dissection
Aortic Dissection is a sample topic found in
Harrison's Practice.
To find other Harrison's Practice topics
please login or purchase a subscription.